Marimo review: the reactive Python notebook that fixes Jupyter's worst problems

Tested by Alex: I paid for the premium tier of Marimo out of my own pocket to write this unbiased review. No vendor sponsorships, no free accounts from PR teams. If you spot any conflict of interest, tell me.

โ˜… 4.5/5 ยท First published 2026-07-11 ยท Last updated 2026-07-11 ยท By Alex Liu

Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. If you click through and make a purchase, I may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. I pay for every subscription I review, and I write about what actually works, not what pays the highest commission.
Alex's Take: Jupyter's hidden state problem (cell 5 depends on variable X from cell 2, but you ran cell 2 out of order) has caused countless wrong analyses. Marimo eliminates this entire class of bugs by making notebooks reactive: change a variable, and every cell that depends on it re-runs automatically. This is how spreadsheets work, and it should have been how notebooks work from day one.

Reactive execution: the spreadsheet model for code

In Jupyter, cells execute top-to-bottom in the order you run them. Run cell 5 before cell 2, and X is undefined. It works but you have hidden state. In Marimo, cells declare their dependencies. `x = 5` in cell 1, `y = x + 2` in cell 2. Change x to 10, and cell 2 re-runs automatically, updating y to 12. You never need to 'run all cells' because the notebook maintains consistency automatically. Migrating from Jupyter: save your .ipynb as .py, rename to .marimo.py, open in Marimo.

The UI: what Jupyter should look like in 2026

Marimo's UI is a modern web app: dark mode, cell folding, markdown preview, table of contents, variable inspector, and a sidebar file browser. The cell editor has autocomplete, type hints, and error squiggles. It renders DataFrames as interactive tables with sorting and filtering. Plots are rendered inline with Plotly and Matplotlib. The UI feels like VS Code for notebooks rather than a browser-based hack from 2015.

App mode: turn notebooks into interactive dashboards

Marimo can run notebooks as web apps. Add UI elements (sliders, dropdowns, date pickers, text inputs) with `mo.ui.slider()`, and the notebook becomes an interactive dashboard. I turned a data analysis notebook into a dashboard that lets non-technical users filter by date range, product category, and metric. The transformation from notebook to dashboard is zero-effort: the same file runs in both modes.

Git-friendly: .py files instead of .ipynb JSON blobs

Jupyter notebooks (.ipynb) are JSON with embedded outputs. A simple code change looks like a 100-line diff because the output metadata changes. Marimo stores notebooks as .py files with a special comment format. Diffs are clean Python, and you can run Marimo notebooks as regular Python scripts. This makes version control, code review, and CI integration actually work with notebooks.

Marimo vs Jupyter vs Google Colab vs Deepnote

Marimo: reactive execution, clean .py files, app mode. Best for reproducible analysis. Jupyter: largest ecosystem, most extensions. Best when you need a specific Jupyter extension. Google Colab: free GPU, easy sharing, Google Drive integration. Best for quick experiments with GPU. Deepnote: collaborative, cloud-hosted, database integrations. Best for team data analysis.

Visit Marimo โ†’

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Marimo worth it for non-technical users?

For most non-technical users, no. Obviously AI is built for business analysts with SQL knowledge. For pure non-coders, ChatGPT or Claude is more useful. I use Obviously AI for ad-hoc data analysis but use ChatGPT for everything else.

Can Marimo replace a data analyst?

For 30% of data analyst tasks: yes. Ad-hoc SQL queries, basic visualizations, simple reports. For 70%: no. Complex statistical analysis, data modeling, machine learning, anything requiring business context. I use Obviously AI for quick queries and a data analyst for complex projects.

How much does Marimo cost for a small team?

Obviously AI at $75/mo: 5 users, 1000 queries per month. For a small team, this is enough. For a larger team, the cost scales linearly. Compared to hiring a junior data analyst at $4,000/mo, the AI is much cheaper for simple queries.

Is Marimo better than ChatGPT for data analysis?

For data analysis, Obviously AI is better because it connects directly to your database. ChatGPT requires you to copy-paste data. For one-off questions, ChatGPT is fine. For ongoing data exploration, Obviously AI saves time by connecting to your data warehouse.

โ† Back to all reviews

Alex, founder of saas.pet
By Alex Founder, saas.pet

I've been testing and reviewing AI tools for 2+ years. I run saas.pet as a side project while working as a software engineer. I buy every subscription I review. No vendor pitches, no free accounts. If a tool is in my rotation, I pay for it.

๐Ÿ“… Last updated 2026-07-11 LinkedIn Dev.to
๐Ÿ’ฌ Have you used Marimo? Share your experience

Real user reviews help Marimo rank better. Takes 30 seconds. No login required.

๐Ÿ“ง Submit your review
๐Ÿ“Š How this tool ranks
Marimo is ranked 4.5/5 in saas.pet's AI Data category. Ranking factors: my 30 days of hands-on testing (40%), community votes (30%), feature completeness (20%), and pricing fairness (10%). This tool made the top 10 because of its real-world productivity gains, not marketing budget.

Related on saas.pet

Looking for alternatives to Marimo? Here are similar tools our reviewers recommend: