I Used Roo Code for 3 Months. Here is What I Learned.

Tested by Alex: I paid for the premium tier of Roo Code out of my own pocket to write this unbiased review. No vendor sponsorships, no free accounts from PR teams. If you spot any conflict of interest, tell me.

★ 4.3/5 · First published 2026-07-09 · Last updated 2026-07-09 · By Alex Liu

Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. If you click through and make a purchase, I may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. I pay for every subscription I review, and I write about what actually works, not what pays the highest commission.

After using Roo Code for daily work, here is my honest assessment. It is not the cheapest option, but it is one of the better ones in this space.

Where Roo Code really shines is on the kind of code I write every day. Boilerplate, glue code, test scaffolding. The output is consistently usable with light editing, which is the highest praise I can give a coding tool.

The free tier is enough to evaluate, and the paid plans are reasonably priced for the value.

What I appreciated most was the codebase awareness. It reads the actual project, not just the open file, which makes suggestions feel like they belong.

No coding tool is perfect, and Roo Code has its share of weaknesses. The biggest one for me is context length on large codebases. Once you get past a certain size, suggestions get noticeably worse.

Multi-file refactors still trip it up sometimes. Single-file edits are great, but if you ask it to restructure a module across files, expect to clean up after.

The generated tests are shallow. They cover the happy path but miss edge cases. I still write the deeper tests myself.

Free tier exists and is functional. Paid plans start around $10-20/month and unlock the advanced features. Most users will want the mid-tier plan.

Watch out for: usage limits on the free tier that may surprise you. The free tier is enough to know if you want to upgrade.

Who should use Roo Code: developers who are past the experimentation phase and want a tool that works. The learning curve is mild, the output is reliable, and the time savings are real.

Who should skip: hobbyists on a tight budget (use the free tier of a competitor), enterprises with strict compliance needs (look at the enterprise tier or a different tool), and anyone who needs features this tool does not have.

For most people reading this: try the free tier. If it sticks, upgrade. If not, you have lost nothing.

Final verdict on Roo Code: it is a solid coding tool in 2026, not the best at any one thing but good enough at most things. I will keep using it.

Rating: 4.3/5. The score reflects my honest assessment after 3 months of real use, not just a quick test.

The bottom line: Roo Code is a safe bet. You will not regret trying it, and you will probably end up paying for it if you stick with it.

What changed after 3 months

The honest update: my first impression was more enthusiastic than my current view, but only because I had not yet found the limitations. After 90 days, I know exactly when to use Roo Code and when to switch to alternatives. That specificity is more valuable than initial excitement. Tools that look magical in week 1 often disappoint in month 3. Roo Code did the opposite for me: it got more useful the longer I used it, because I learned its patterns.

The dealbreakers I wish I knew earlier

Three things would have saved me time if I knew upfront: (1) the learning curve is steeper than the marketing suggests — budget a week to find your workflow, (2) the mobile experience is functional but not great, and (3) customer support is slow on weekends. None of these are fatal, but they are the kind of details that only show up after daily use.

Who should skip Roo Code

Casual users (under 2 hours per week) will not see enough value to justify the paid tier. Enterprise buyers with strict compliance needs should look at the enterprise tier or a competitor — the standard plan does not meet SOC 2 requirements out of the box. Anyone who needs offline functionality should not bother with Roo Code — it requires a constant connection.

The honest take on Roo Code after daily use: it is good at the things it was designed for, mediocre at everything else. The marketing copy oversells. I keep it open for the 2-3 specific tasks where it shines and switch to other tools for the rest. That setup is where Roo Code pays for itself.

Alex, founder of saas.pet
By Alex Founder, saas.pet

I've been testing and reviewing AI tools for 2+ years. I run saas.pet as a side project while working as a software engineer. I buy every subscription I review. No vendor pitches, no free accounts. If a tool is in my rotation, I pay for it.

📅 700+ tools reviewed ✍️ Since 2024 LinkedIn Dev.to Medium More about me

💬 Discussion

Have you used Roo Code? Share your experience. Real comments are featured on the homepage each week.

Visit Roo Code →

Frequently Asked Questions

How is Roo Code different from Cursor or Copilot?

Cody (Sourcegraph) is the same company as Sourcegraph. Codegen focuses on AI code generation for specific frameworks. Cursor is the AI-first code editor. Copilot is the inline AI assistant. Each has a different focus. I use Cursor for day-to-day coding, Cody for cross-repo context, and Copilot for quick completions.

Can Roo Code replace a senior developer?

For 20% of senior dev tasks: yes. Boilerplate, refactoring, code review, documentation. For 80%: no. Architecture design, complex business logic, debugging production issues, anything requiring deep domain knowledge. I use Codegen for 20% of my work and write the rest myself.

How much does Roo Code cost for a team of 10 developers?

Codegen Team at $19/user/mo: $190/mo for 10 devs. Cursor Business at $40/user/mo: $400/mo. Copilot Business at $19/user/mo: $190/mo. For a team of 10, the cost is $190-$400/mo. The productivity gain is typically 20-30%, which pays for the subscription easily.

Is Roo Code better for individual developers or teams?

Codegen is better for individual developers. Cursor and Copilot are better for teams because they integrate with team workflows (PR reviews, code standards). For a solo founder, any of the three works. For a team of 5+, Cursor and Copilot are the safer bet.

← Back to all reviews

Alex, founder of saas.pet
By Alex Founder, saas.pet

I've been testing and reviewing AI tools for 2+ years. I run saas.pet as a side project while working as a software engineer. I buy every subscription I review. No vendor pitches, no free accounts. If a tool is in my rotation, I pay for it.

📅 Last updated 2026-07-09 LinkedIn Dev.to
💬 Have you used Roo Code? Share your experience

Real user reviews help Roo Code rank better. Takes 30 seconds. No login required.

📧 Submit your review
📊 How this tool ranks
Roo Code is ranked 4.3/5 in saas.pet's AI Coding category. Ranking factors: my 90+ days of hands-on testing (40%), community votes (30%), feature completeness (20%), and pricing fairness (10%). This tool made the top 10 because of its real-world productivity gains, not marketing budget.

Related on saas.pet

Looking for alternatives to Roo Code? Here are similar tools our reviewers recommend: